How the ECM Conflict Score is built
The score is an analytical model, not an official company or utility rating.
0–100
A 0–100 analytical index that separates infrastructure pressure into five auditable dimensions.
Interconnection queues, transmission timing, substation and utility-node constraints.
Watershed stress, cooling architecture and competition for treated or raw water.
Firm supply, hourly low-carbon availability, fuel exposure and local generation adequacy.
Permitting friction, local opposition, moratoria and policy uncertainty.
Concentration of announced capacity relative to regional delivery capability.
Data classes
REPORTED Direct statement in a primary or official source.
DERIVED Calculation derived from a reported input with the formula disclosed.
MODELED Scenario estimate; never presented as an audited company total.
Confidence A / B / C
A — location or headline project fact directly reported.
B — project reported, but location or capacity remains aggregated / allocated.
C — analytical reference point with material uncertainty; treat as directional only.
Non-negotiable rules
1. A marker must state its location precision. 2. A modeled value must never be styled as a live measurement. 3. Material revisions go into the public changelog. 4. Third-party source rights remain with their owners. 5. The score describes ECM analytical pressure, not project quality or company conduct.